扶凯

转载本站文章请注明，转载自：扶凯[http://www.php-oa.com]

本文链接: http://www.php-oa.com/2010/07/08/squid-2-6-2-7-3-0.html

对比目前所有 squid 的标准版本中性能的对比,以及确认Squid 2.7 和 Squid 3.1 的性能有多大分别.每次不同的测试前,一定要清掉上一次的 cache_dir 中的 cache 的 object .

测试方法：
1.每次在测试前,先删除所有的 cache_dir 中的内容
2. squid -z 来初始化 cache_dir
3. 使用 ab.new -c 200 -n 30000 "http://test.php-oa.com/4k.html?cct00003000" 来重复打压力三次.确认所有内容都是内存命中
4. 当这些内容都 HIT 时,做最终的一次 ab 测试 ,得出结果

测试结果：

结论：

Squid 3.1 和 Squid 2.7 对比 另外,从测试数据中也可以看出. squid 3.1 使用了 C++ 重写后,性能上和 Squid 2.6 和 2.7 还是有些距离的.

Squid 2.6 和 Squid 2.7 对比 在 Squid 2.6 测试时,感觉不如 2.7 稳定 ,打出压力的响应分别有点远,有时只有 5k 多,有时 6k 多,不过,总的来看看,性能高出 2.7 一些. 但 Squid 2.7 功能更加完善.值得选择.

详细测试结果：

Squid 2.7
Concurrency Level: 200
Time taken for tests: 4.983 seconds
Complete requests: 30000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 135869997 bytes
HTML transferred: 122880000 bytes
Requests per second: 6020.49 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 33.220 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.166 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 26627.73 [Kbytes/sec] received

Connection Times (ms)

Squid 2.6
Concurrency Level: 200
Time taken for tests: 4.595 seconds
Complete requests: 30000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 135930000 bytes
HTML transferred: 122880000 bytes
Requests per second: 6528.70 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 30.634 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.153 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 28888.21 [Kbytes/sec] received

Squid 3.1
Time taken for tests: 6.979 seconds
Complete requests: 30000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 135908818 bytes
HTML transferred: 122884096 bytes
Requests per second: 4298.66 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 23.263 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.233 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 19017.79 [Kbytes/sec] received