<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>扶凯 &#187; KeepAlive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.php-oa.com/tag/keepalive/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.php-oa.com</link>
	<description>Perl Linux CDN Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>长连接(KeepAlive)在 http 连接中的性能影响</title>
		<link>http://www.php-oa.com/2010/06/30/keepalive-http1-1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.php-oa.com/2010/06/30/keepalive-http1-1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>扶 凯</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux 调优]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KeepAlive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[长连接]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.php-oa.com/?p=2832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[一直很想知道,在 http 1.1 中的长连接功能,如果在理想的环境中,对性能的影响.所以简单的做了一下测试 未使用长连接 Concurrency Level: 200 Time taken for tests: 7.016 seconds Complete requests: 30000 Failed requests:... ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.php-oa.com/2010/06/30/keepalive-http1-1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>squid是否支持http1.1和对KeepAlive支持的个人理解</title>
		<link>http://www.php-oa.com/2008/11/06/squid-keepalive.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.php-oa.com/2008/11/06/squid-keepalive.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>扶 凯</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CDN 技术]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KeepAlive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Squid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.php-oa.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;squid是否支持http1.1 研究Squid蛮久了,感觉Squid是不是能实现部分http/1.1的功能一直有疑问,根据日志中见到,当你的请求经过Squid后,然后转到Web服务器时.你会发现Squid中的日志是显示使用的协议... ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.php-oa.com/2008/11/06/squid-keepalive.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apache 的 KeepAlive 和 TCP/IP 的 TIME_WAIT</title>
		<link>http://www.php-oa.com/2008/04/25/apachedekeepalivehetcpipdetime_wait.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.php-oa.com/2008/04/25/apachedekeepalivehetcpipdetime_wait.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KeepAlive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux 调优]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCP/IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIME_WAIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.php-oa.com/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[今天检查了一下基本一台服务器,发现TIME_WAIT高到3k多.TIME_WAIT本身并不会占用很大资源的,除非受到攻击.但太多服务器还是有可能挂掉. TIME_WAIT 3699 CLOSE_WAIT 52 FIN_WAIT1 32 SYN_SENT 1 FIN_WAIT2 2 ESTABLISHED 1... ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.php-oa.com/2008/04/25/apachedekeepalivehetcpipdetime_wait.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

